Wednesday, 06 March 2019 

(AKA Wotan's Day) (I'm guessing everyone already knows all about the confusion.)

(It's Izanami's day!)



22:54 EST
     I've added more songs to my playlist.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
15:40 EST
     It appears Alexandria Occassional-Cortex's legal troubles are more than mere conservative pipedreaming. Be sure to keep an ear to the ground.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
14:32 EST
     How ironic is it that we should keep finding the best reporting and most intelligent commentary in, of all things, RT?



     And if you thought my talk of a second Civil War a bit irresponsible, you should know that I'm only echoing what the liberals and their yellow journalists are already saying out loud, as we see in that article. Worse, I fear, they're seriously preparing for it, too.
     And just take note of that closing sentence: "Its prejudiced and agenda-based reporting is a disgrace and really nothing short of a bona fide national security threat."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
11:55 EST
     A little rant.
     I'm sure you've all noticed by now the creeping changes in our language. Things like "you get me". What does that really even mean? Or how about "I got your back." I knew what my mother meant when my brother was 3, and she told him "I got your nose." But how do you get someone's back?
     It's bad enough that ad agencies are allowed to run amok with our communal language, bending it to their 'brand recognition' will (WAZZAP!), and even worse that we have enemy forces trying to destroy us by weaving poison-pills like social justice, white privilege, cultural appropriation, and micro-aggression into our conversation, and, thus, into our perception of reality.
     As if all that weren't enough, we even have the sub-human likes of motivational speakers attempting (successfully, it appears) to reshape our language (and minds) in their own image. What other explanation can there be for such tortured and torturous expressions as 'going forward' and 'on-going'?
     What? They never heard of the word, subsequently? Or continuing?
     Granted, it is entirely possible that such abominations are merely the unintentional result of foreigners and/or products of the US public education system searching their meager vocabularies in vain for better words with which to express their ideas, but, seriously now, don't people tend to help each other out in times like this? I've seen it many, many times. I've even been corrected myself. How unkind, uncivilized would it be to allow someone to continue embarassing themselves that way? No one gets away with referring to an automobile as an horseless carriage for long. They figure it out pretty quickly. The only way improper forms not only continue, but even propagate into ever wider use is when those of apparent authority are promoting them, and I can just see some Stephen R. Covey chanting to his enthralled admirers, "FROM is a negative word. FORWARD is a positive word. GOING FORWARD we shall no more say FROM now on!"
     And all the minions refrain, "GOING FORWARD!"
     And our language suffers yet another mutation, not at the hands of natural selection, but at the business-end of a burst of ionizing radiation.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
10:05 EST

The Fylfot


By the way, these pictures are usually links to their articles. Click on them to read more.
     Did you know that this is the proper name of the Swastika?
     Sooner or later, we're going to have to reclaim our heritage from from the Nazis/Leftists.
     Hitler, after all, was a vegetarian. Should we stop eating salads with our steaks?
     The Nazis wore pants, shirts, and ties. Should we ban Wall Street?
     Germans love almonds. They're almost as ubiquitous as pork. Should we outlaw them, too?
     The Swastika actually exists in many forms, and is one of those rare symbols that link us all back to our common heritage. You'd think liberals would like that idea.
     Curiously, this symbol, in one form or another, is so widespread, and so ancient, that it appears to have antedeluvian origins, and appears to be derived from an even more ancient symbol: The cross. And not just any cross; the equal-armed cross, or X.
     And they are just everywhere:









     And, as it turns out, some say that my family name finds its origin in this cross, the crossing of the roads, the 4 roads, the 4 ways, the 4 winds of heaven, the 4 sides of the camp of Israel, the 4 rivers which flowed out of the garden of Eden.
     And that is my heritage. It is my children's heritage. It is your heritage. It is a sign of the sons of God.
     You mark my words; it won't be long before this cross, too, is outlawed by our enemies. So we'd better start protecting it now. Get a head start on them. This is not just your heritage; it's your identity. If you let them erase your identity, they erase you.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
08:37 EST
     We should probably start learning about Ammonia. I have a feeling it's about to become pretty important.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
07:52 EST
     Where are the western feminists? Are they expecting the few remaining men in the west to lay down their lives defending western women from the destruction they invited into our lands? Think I'm exagerrating? Look up pro-immigrant protests in Europe. What's the ration of men to women. Ok, now, have a closer look at those 'men'. Once more, what's the ratio of men to women?



     I'll tell you exactly where the feminists are: They're essentially cowering, cowering by doubling down on their current victims, afraid those victims will notice that they, the feminists, are secretly fainting in fear of being treated like women in Muslim lands, afraid that the men they've blugeoned into submission will see how successfully Muslim men have bested them, and how.
     Does this sound unlikely? Study bully behavior and tactics. It fits perfectly. They only pick on those they know they can intimidate, and that would be western men. And they attempt to separate their victims from anyone who might encourage their victims to fight back, and that would be Muslim men.


     Feminists were always bullies, and all their talk about male chauvenism was based on envy of male strengths, strengths born of the higher standards to which men were held, strengths which the feminists immediately set about destroying.


     Feminists were always leftists, employing that eternal tool of all leftists: Projection. Everything they accused 'men' of was really what they themselves were guilty of, as they have since shown beyond all argument. As I've said before, the modern, western woman is indeed guilty of far more than she only ever imagined the 'old, white, men' of her public-school implanted nightmares were.
     Just witness their ultimate victims: A generation of men denied jobs, denied their right to raise their children, even denied the fruits of their own labor, a generation of children deprived of proper male and female role models, capped by millions of murdered infants who never even made it that far.
     Feminism was always bullying, camouflaged, as bullies are wont to do, by accusing everyone else of bullying.
     MGTOW is the west's future as western men respond in the only way western laws condone.
     Isaiah prophecied this.
     As did Paul.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


~~ Marcus Aurelius ~~