Tuesday, 30 April 2019

(It's Horus' day!)



     I'm going to have to change my format yet again. I've been so busy, I can hardly find the time to get all the threads I'm following into these articles, and the queue is getting absurdly long. In order to rectify that, I'm going to comment less, at least for now, and just dump everything ... ok, well, most of ... well, ok, a lot of ... what I've been reading/watching here for you to peruse with only minimal commentary from me. Except where I'd already written half a book before I got distracted. And that may may some of what follows seem a bit disjointed. Sorry.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     Before we go any further, I really think you should take the time to watch/hear this:


     And this one, too:


     These devils aren't just abusing our children; they're committing genocide by seducing an entire generation into suicide.
     They are Nazis indeed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     What follows is a response I posted to this video: (But I think they deleted it.)


     The relationship between the two churches has nothing to do with anything other than the fact that many highly placed Catholics have joined the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, building a bridge between the two faiths. You will be held accountable by God for such wild speculation!
     Stop spreading lies! They do NOT worship any angel, and certainly not Moroni. Get correct information. You will be held accountable by God.?
     Probably had a ritual sacrifice?! Probably?! You have utterly no idea what you're talking about. You are spreading conjecture disguised as truth, pretending to be the result of 'investigation'.
     Sources in SLC?! Your sources?! Abortions?! Witnesses?! OMG!!! You are such a liar! You are a total prevaricator. You exploit the mentally ill!
     Sarah! Ever been in a temple? How many members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints have you known? Remember Brett Kavanaugh? Don't you understand how charlatans like this guy work? Talk about discrediting the witness! I'll attack you both on the basis of the evidence. YOU HAVE NONE! Sarah! You're talking just like the liberals: 'the gravity of the charges warrants...', 'the nature of accusations...', ... And, of course, these 'sources' are all 'credible'. SHE MUST BE BELIEVED! You are just like the DNC devils.
     Murder by Decree was a fanciful, and entirely false work of 1970s, Masonic, Jack-the-Ripper fiction. How appropriate that you should name your operation after it.
     Russian Mafia, too?! What's next? Aliens?
     WHY DON'T YOU DO SOME REAL RESEARCH FOR A CHANGE! You can't do this stuff from your living room. All you deal in is rumors.
     What do you know about the Bible? You tell me what he drew on the ground! And why does it matter?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     More reasons why I just don't take too many scientists too seriously.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     Hy-Brasil sound fantastic? Remember how Moses tells that Egyptus found the land of Egypt while it was still under water? And, as it turns out, we've found cities in Egypt and India which sank into the sea, and can still be seen today, but nothing else around them sank. This earth has a long history of land, even entire cities, rising above or falling below sea-level.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     Hmmm... two, parallel rivers of fire coiled around the earth ... Could it be that the Van Allen belts were once as visible as the aurorae borealis sometimes are? And could it be that the ancients could make out that there were two of them?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     We are lied to in so many ways.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     Studying the Constitution was, for me, among my most formative experiences. How so? Take, for example, the Bill of Rights. Do you know how they came to be? The situation went something like this. The Continental Congress finally sorted out the problems with earlier attempts, and arrived at the Constitution. They thought they'd finally struck gold, but, upon sharing it with the various state governments for review, the first and most frequent criticism to return was something along the lines of, "Yeah, well, this all sounds great, but what does it mean in daily practice? Do we get to practice our religions, keep our guns, etc.?" (Remember how these people wound up in the Americas in the first place.) And the Continental Congress took this criticism, debated among themselves, and decided that some examples of practical application actually made sense. After all, the Law of Moses did the same thing. So, they set about very carefully describing, in the broadest yet finest terms possible, what that Constitution now actually meant to us, effectively playing the role of the first Supreme Court. This, by the way, is precisely why outright contradictions to the Constitution are not (supposed to be) allowed as amendments. Amendments are just supposed to be the fine points, the clarifications to the Constitution. This is, by the way, why that envelope gets pushed to the breaking point. If anyone wanted to make an 'amendment' that contradicts the Constitution, then a Constitutional Convention is required, and that's far harder to achieve. And that, by the way, is one of the reasons for the electoral college. Our government is conservative by design, conservative meaning moderate, not prone to change with fashion or any other whim of mankind (an idea you'll find stated right up front in The Declaration of Independence), hard to change. That's why the Republican party was mocked by radicals as an elephant: Slow to move. Slow to change. And yet, that's exactly what our founders intended. Just look at the Constitution of Solon. Upon his decade-long sojourn, he left the Athenians with the charge to change nothing about it until his return, whereupon they would discuss any concerns which might have arisen. (Yes, this is where the term, Draconian, comes from.)
     So, how did this (in)form me? It taught me to always look for the details, and to anticipate unintended consequences. Have a look at Charlie Chaplin's famous speech from his film, The Great Dictator.


     Notice anything missing?
     How about the details? The examples of practical application? How does he mean to achieve any of those lofty ideals?
     You really should read Hitler's speeches. All of them. Know what you're talking about. Always know what you're talking about. Never repeat what you've heard from others unless you explain that this is what you're doing, and, even then, you may want to be able to name names in order to appropriately place blame.
     Hitler Quotes:
     peaceful competition of the nations
     peacefully connecting the peoples to one another
     The first step toward promoting transportation with the aim of achieving a reasonable balance of all transportation interests-a reform of the motor vehicle tax-will take place at the beginning of next month. The maintenance of the Reichsbahn and its reintegration under Reich authority, which is to be effected as quickly as possible, is a task which commits us not only in an economic, but also in a moral sense. The National Government will give every encouragement to the development of aviation as a means of peacefully connecting the peoples to one another.
     The German people wish to live in peace with the world.
     Germany wants nothing except equal rights to live and equal freedom.
     The rights of the Churches will not be curtailed and their position vis-à-vis the State will not be altered.
     Why, he sounds positively Chaplinesque, doesn't he? Maybe that's why he wore the same mustache.
     And, by the way, for those who doubt that Hitler was a leftist, this is a direct quote from a debate he had with the SPD (Social Democratic Party) in the German Congress:
     "You say the National Socialist (Nazi) Revolution has nothing to do with Socialism, but rather that its Socialism exists only in the sense that it persecutes the only pillar of Socialism in Germany, the SPD.
     "You are sissies, Gentlemen, and not worthy of this age, if you start talking about persecution at this stage of the game. What has been done to you? You are sitting here and your speaker is being listened to with patience."
     See? He's stating in unequivocal terms that he regards his movement to be the only true Socialist movement because, unlike the SPD,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     You can probably guess what my response to this might be. When I was single, I met a lot of divorcees who sang this same song. Me, me, me. I love myself. It's never about anyone else. In fact, such people, believing such philosophies, know in their heart of hearts that what they're doing is wrong, and that's where their shame comes from. You'll find a repeated theme in the scriptures about how people desperately delude themselves that everyone else is at fault, to blame, but them. Look up the word, shame. You'll see.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     Oh, yeah. I forgot all about the SPLC. Can't wait to see that all unfold. In the mean-time Lionel is dead-on here: This cheating scandal is going to prove to be the Achilles heel that no one, no one saw coming.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     This whole 'sanctuary city' thing is proving a sword which cuts both ways, but only one way gets its edge from the Constitution.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     How can you know for sure? We are inundated from all sides with opinion disguised as fact, with passion disguised as logic, and with justification disguised as justice. So, how can you tell? All too often, we only know in review, hindsight being 20/20. But there is a way, and we all know it. But how many are familiar with that form of intelligence? Let me give you a clue, a 'key'. This is why I appreciate Tucker Carlson. I've long and often said that we must always heed the nuance of language, and even punctuation. Tucker does just that, and call his guests out for their attempts to use evasive language. And, believe you me, these people are very practiced at their craft. Those aren't just the normal irregularities of speaking informally. Those are calculated and practiced speeches. That's why they keep talking over their host. They want their words on record as spoken, so that they can point out to us how we have mistakenly interpreted their meaning based on our own presumptions of how their words ought to have been uttered. And that's deception. And it's meant to deceive the unwary and the ignorant. It's meant to deceive most of America. But Tucker catches them in the act, and shines a light on their fork-tongued craft. But, they, in keeping with their practiced craft, refuse to so much as acknowledge that he caught them in the act. They never counter the charge. They just bulldoze right over it. And that's your clue right there. Tucker is right. They are liars.



~~ Marcus Aurelius ~~